Monday, May 20, 2019
Argumentative Essay against Capital Punishment Essay
Human spiritedness is sacred. This is an ideal that the majority of hoi polloi do-nothing agree upon to a certain extent. For this reason taking the life of another has always been considered the almost deplorable of crimes, one worthy of the harshest available penalization. Thus arises one of the great moral dilemmas of our time. Should taking the life of one who has taken the life of others be considered an available penalization?Capital punishment is immoral and a violation of natural rights. It is wrong for everyone involved the prosecuted unobjectionable, criminals, victims families, and our nation. We need to replace the death penalty and bang-up punishment with life without parole, a safer and more inexpensive option. The death penalty does not guarantee safety for innocent victims, it does not follow the goals and promises of our nation, it does not effectively deter crime, and it does not give closure to victims families. Nothing dear comes of hate, and nothing gri evous can ever come from capital punishment. It cannot continue to be accepted by a nation that claims to keep up liberty and justice for all. The death penalty is murder on the slick and its dead wrong.Capital punishment must not be implemented because it can elapse to the possibility of outlawed execution. It is undeniable that there had already been many citizenry sentenced of death penalty that were in conclusion executed even if they were truly innocent. Unfortunately, the crucial evidence that would have proven the innocence of these people was sole(prenominal) obtained after their execution (McCafferty 71). It is because of wrongful executions that capital punishment must not be implemented in inn. They only create doubts into the minds of the people that they cannot rely on the justice system especially once they in earnest need it. This is also hard to accept on the part of the families who already had members who experienced a wrongful execution as this is someth ing that has a permanent impact. Obviously, the innocent people wrongfully executed can never be brought back to life anymore. Since the courts cannot be expected to make the best decisions allthe time with ascertain to the people who deserve conviction and acquittal, it is difficult to guarantee that wrongful executions can be completely stop in countries that have death penalty.This is why capital punishment prevents the wrongfully accused people of the collectable process that they deserve to have in order to prove their innocence, something that is very unfair to them. There can be instances where the evidence that can prove their innocence is just so difficult to obtain so it takes a long point of time before it gets presented to the Court. However, because there is also a limited period of time to appeal for the death penalty sentence, it is usually the case that the wrongfully accused people be already executed before the evidence that could have set them free is discover ed. This would not have happened if there is no capital punishment being implemented.Aside from this, another detrimental impact of capital punishment is that it only helps to send a kernel to the people that the justice system is an advocate of revenge peculiarly on the part of the people who got victimized by heinous crimes. The capital punishment sends a message to the people that the justice system is just there to help the families of the victims of the heinous crimes and not for the accused people who could also be innocent (Kronenwetter 36). This can also be interpreted as a punishment that does not propose any opportunity for the offenders to correct their mistakes. In this case, the justice system can be viewed as partial and biased as it only helps the victims and not the accused party. The lawyers of the accused party result then have to work extremely hard to gather evidence to spare their client from capital punishment.Finally, a society that values life does not in tentionally kill people. The truth is that capital punishment is a traumatic case of homicide that has been approved by the government. This practically supports killing in order to chit-chat a solution to the problems that are being faced by society (Mandery 58). This is something that is not very good particularly on the part of the youth who will grow up knowing that the government is approved of just killing people who violated the law. The funny thing is thatgovernments all over the world have tried to validate capital punishment by stating what they think are the advantages of death penalty would provide to the people. The advantages of death penalty can be considered as illusory, but the chaos and the eventual annihilation of the decency of the society are very true. Thus, there is no sense to implement capital punishment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.